Leandro skrev:
>>
>>  1º Why need I pass a Directory objecto (obligatory) on constructor of
>>> SpellChecker?
>>>
>> Mainly because it is a nasty peice of code. But it does a good job.
>>
> 
> How can we suggest it (create an normal constructor without param) to the
> team?

Sorry, I missunderstood your question. See other reply.

>> There are no typos in your example so you really don't even need a spell
>> checker for that. Using OR clauses in your query would be enough.
> 
> I guess no, because user will enter : "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of
> the King" ... and the system should response with:
> 
> 
> Similar:
> The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
> The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
> 
> I can't see how can I do that?  (just using the OR statement)
> For example:
> 
> name like '%the%'
> or
> name like '%Lord%'
> or
> name like '%of%'
> or
> name like '%the%'
> or
> name like '%Rings%'
> 
> will produce so much results besides to be non-performatic...

Are you sure about that? Did you benchmark? Can we see the results?




     karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org