lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan Vasilev <>
Subject Re: Integrating Spell Checker contributed to Lucene
Date Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:23:53 GMT
Thanks Mathieu,

I tryed to checkout but without success. Anyway I can do it manually, 
but as the contribution is still not approved from Lucene our chiefs 
will not whant it to be included to our project by now.
OK Thanks once again :)


PS: Here is the output from the SVN version win32-1.4.5:

E:\SVN\svn-win32-1.4.5\bin>svn co 
Error validating server certificate for '':
 - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the
   fingerprint to validate the certificate manually!
 - The certificate hostname does not match.
 - The certificate has expired.
Certificate information:
 - Hostname:
 - Valid: from Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:21:51 GMT until Thu, 09 Mar 2006 
19:21:51 GMT
 - Issuer: Quihou, Garambrogne, Saint Mande, Val de Marne, FR
 - Fingerprint: f4:f4:09:14:e5:4e:33:f8:05:d1:a2:73:b6:0c:b4:03:d9:13:83:9b
(R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? t
svn: PROPFIND request failed on 
svn: PROPFIND of '/projets/revuedepresse/browser/trunk/src/java': 200 OK 

Mathieu Lecarme wrote:
> Ivan Vasilev a écrit :
>> Thanks Mathieu for your help!
>> The contribution that you have made to Lucene by this patch seems to 
>> be great, but the hunspell dictionary is under LGPL which the lawyer 
>> of our company does not like.
> It's the spell tool used by Openoffice and firefox. Data must be multi 
> licencied. Maybe you'll find the right licence for you. Older version 
> (aspell and ispell) may fit you more.
>> Wordnet dictionary seems to be more free and may be could help 
>> together with your patch.
>> In the Lucene's Jira I found the issue LUCENE-1190 
>> <> and I have the 
>> following questions about it:
>> 1. There are two apthone-lexicon.patch - is one of them out of date? 
>> Is the 336 KB current version?
> bigger is newer. I'm working on a third version.
>> 2. In the Lucene SVN 
>> ( I can 
>> not find the code of your contribution.
> the patch is submited, but not yet approved.
>> In the same time the link from Jira opens a very long file containing 
>> all the classes and packages of your patch and each row is prefixed 
>> by "+". It is very inconvenient to recreate the source code packages 
>> out of it. If possible could you give a link from where to get these 
>> sources as they are?
> It's a standard patch (man patch).
> Here is the svn :
> You can do a svn checkout.
> M.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> __________ NOD32 2973 (20080326) Information __________
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message