Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of acidbriggs@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=CkihFInHqa9mAEb2E1zSZB1XG4nqUnNbKIbXvjMWFUnBhbfc+Kn3I85VsQvAv6ti4hk8xgDahQWdpUxr1tOdt5d0tkJgFBwM1WCfGHUl/3TYEasIq++IvekVmhjeAxzjd4fjBrDF8r2/Ai3cP5GjEjMyTUyGJbliVtJNv+jXy60=
Message-ID: <1c0e93080802031411m3712ab17s804a35c7f5eb05dc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:11:22 -0500
From: Briggs <acidbriggs@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing Speed: 2.3 vs 2.2 (real world numbers)
In-Reply-To: <4b124c310802031157l2e7790b9oe1608beb6c5a6dd6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4b124c310802031157l2e7790b9oe1608beb6c5a6dd6@mail.gmail.com>

Damn, really?  I haven't had the opportunity to test this yet.  Has
anyone else seen this kind of improvement?


On Feb 3, 2008 2:57 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>   I know you lucene devs did a lot of work on indexing performance in 2.3,
> and I just tested it out last thursday, so I thought I'd let you know how it
> fared:
>
>   On a 2.17 million document index, a recent test gave indexing time to be:
>
>     * lucene 2.2: 4.83 hours
>     * lucene 2.3: 26 minutes
>
>   About a factor of 11 speedup.  Holy smokes!  Great work folks.
>
>
>   -jake
>


-- 
"Conscious decisions by conscious minds are what make reality real"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org