Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79735 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2007 17:48:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2007 17:48:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 88410 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2007 17:48:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 88368 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2007 17:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 88357 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2007 17:48:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:48:21 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chris.lu@gmail.com designates 72.14.214.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.214.230] (HELO hu-out-0506.google.com) (72.14.214.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:47:57 +0000 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 27so546534hub.15 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=uRn6pyBYSVm1IWOU6dlKupewoDE0oC53psQivW75n7U=; b=a3+16fWENIXMFe1SKMdqzJDzZmKvAejFtHX3JFnZ760pBMSjZP6FPSBAGF9YJWZnjznrpPR45nfjF4ZePSyw6FkAzuURPzTxw1xMnmTBmtm1SCVSVRf81WGqZSFVSa6ESwczzvD7ZbZqCQ4hbd5IjLjupRwnhkl1jOkt4eDf5Ds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LaL3+zZp0hi3kOxdbIBsq9eNHVo2L0Uj2FsvYtkIOnJmzGWLkNCk2ByGkXvMYK2mz7jaQ6Bwc33dfTkkxIs3HIhj9R9UzqE+H0IOlb2ufh3VKSXecl7ZH/hWsobN91h0iYGuD6C2BUu8KlohEJQcq6g12VlF3sdfavN4OiiN+5E= Received: by 10.78.122.16 with SMTP id u16mr228522huc.21.1197654479211; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.155.15 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e3ae6310712140947v5f17dbe8q88b4fe0b2e6836ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:47:59 -0800 From: "Chris Lu" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, te@statsbiblioteket.dk Subject: Re: Heads-up on SSD In-Reply-To: <1197629949.3515.29.camel@PC990.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1197629949.3515.29.camel@PC990.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Toke, This is fantastic stuff! I always wanted to convince (rich) customers to try SSD. Now it's more convincing! I think the results will be more interesting for indexing, which has a lot of file merges. -- Chris Lu ------------------------- Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application site: http://www.dbsight.net demo: http://search.dbsight.com Lucene Database Search in 3 minutes: http://wiki.dbsight.com/index.php?title=Create_Lucene_Database_Search_in_3_minutes DBSight customer (remain anonymous per request) got 2.6 Million Euro funding! On Dec 14, 2007 2:59 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > There's an interesting article on state-of-the-art setup with Mtron > Solid State Drives at > http://www.nextlevelhardware.com/storage/battleship/ > The concise version is that Mtron flash drives puts all traditional > harddrives to shame and seems especially well suited for applications > that performs a lot of seeks. No surprise there, but read the article > for some eye-opening numbers. > > At The State and University Library in Denmark we've experimented with > two Samsung SSDs vs. two 15.000 RPM traditional harddisks in RAID setup > with our current Lucene index at about 30GB and logged queries from our > users. > > For searches we can confirm that the SSDs are substantially faster, > especially when the available amount of RAM for caching relative to the > index size is small. A teaser-graph can be viewed at > http://wiki.statsbiblioteket.dk/summa/Hardware > > Our test should not be seen as authoritative or even even representative > for Lucene on SSDs in general, but it seems clear to us that users of > Lucene-systems ought to look into SSDs if they haven't already done so. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org