Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46795 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2007 17:14:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2007 17:14:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 74022 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2007 17:14:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73985 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2007 17:14:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73974 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2007 17:14:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:14:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luceneuser4@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.246 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.246] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.246) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:14:39 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d11so99709and for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:14:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=rC2P10E4ohZ33u5R1uVbP68ogDePmLE8v86wR/f2xyk=; b=TX8H+kM+vkXeHaLR75NK/6z/+EnUCmshZI3NXq+oAQ4tRJeqaUocO7yOfIfP66dWABz9RWuMDqt1vW8km8Zin7Zznl97S0Xy7EmPnOkWQ0JTaoDvsyNXtZuwbmkj9wX32MpUpL9iK5N7oNUqlXZJpI40atRBzZC6ZCHYrQ5yFxs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qtxlFQkPxe7jB/vvgiVrkjt4XBba0JkdYg/OVaetG5pfcgkNtcc7TUZfnjvJcNXSH3m3ADOGSzJ8J8NMSwwqWyuyq9SUiKxjezy/4gJKPxo6Em71tytgMaUSIcnRtViivMqextU5Aub5vBk+49JYqUy9inl2UtWVrqkfV6C2CnM= Received: by 10.101.68.19 with SMTP id v19mr3242487ank.1194628458360; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.66.10 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:14:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 12:14:18 -0500 From: "Lucene User" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Comparing Two Indexes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I wanted two compare two indexes.Please recommend an algorithm which takes all the factors into accoubt such as versions of software being used by lucene and application which has an effect on the index being created.We can also compare with certain fields and the text. Regards --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org