Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=qTuAuKrd7Xg9b+eF1SMYCTDfRLpmc3/BxXui7tusA95+aCGimqIIHakFOo1O5DmLri0yA63TacvYRAGFRMcumz5uXpB60t8HWVJ42qT1OwpPPqA/6ypJrYPSp2kJQKz0jtpr/M5Fcj5p7dSriFi7sx09v4wtwkHbR2qH8txFL58=;
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:54:01 +0000 (GMT)
From: mark harwood <markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Searching user-private annotations associated with indexed
 documents
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <59899.43620.qm@web26011.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

Do the annotations have positions ?=0A=0ADo you want to do things like phra=
se-search e.g. =0A     "PERSON_ANNOTATION works for Google" =0A=0AOr is you=
r idea of an annotation more simply a del.ici.ous-style tag associated with=
 the whole document?=0A=0ACheers=0AMark=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0A=
From: lucene user <luz290@gmail.com>=0ATo: java-user@lucene.apache.org=0ASe=
nt: Tuesday, 27 November, 2007 12:31:38 PM=0ASubject: Re: Searching user-pr=
ivate annotations associated with indexed documents=0A=0AI'd be VERY gratef=
ul for your help, folks! Thanks! I really need some=0Ainsight on this. THAN=
KS!!=0A=0AOn Nov 26, 2007 6:43 PM, lucene user <luz290@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=
> Here are the three options that seem practical to us right now.=0A>=0A> (=
1) Do The annotation search in postgres using LIKE or the=0A>    postgres n=
ative full text search. Take the resulting list=0A>    of file ids and use =
it to build a filter for the lucene query,=0A>    the way we currently do f=
or folders.=0A>=0A> (2) Add a second lucene index that contains only annota=
tions.=0A>    First retrieve a list of file ids satisfying the annotation=
=0A>    query from this index and use it to create a filter for the=0A>    =
main lucene query on the archive.=0A>    Whenever annotation text is edited=
,=0A>      if blank, delete annotation from index=0A>      otherwise add or=
 replace annotation in index.=0A>=0A> (3) Add a second lucene index that co=
ntains contentrefs.=0A>     This index would contain the same fields as the=
 arhicve index=0A>     plus the following:=0A>       database_id: list of s=
ystemuser_id and contentref_id.=0A>       annotation:  list of all annotati=
on text for this=0A>                    system user and content ref.=0A>   =
    folders:     list of all folder names for this systemuser and=0A>      =
              content ref=0A>=0A>     Whenever an article is added to or re=
moved from a folder,=0A>     or its annotation text is edited, the followin=
g would occur:=0A>       See if it has an entry in the lucene index for the=
 database.=0A>       if so,=0A>         extract the lucene document from th=
e index.=0A>         if the updated list of folders that contain it is empt=
y,=0A>            delete this document from the lucene database index.=0A> =
        otherwise,=0A>           update the folder and annotation in the do=
cument object.=0A>           delete this document from the index.=0A>      =
     add the updated document object to the index.=0A>       if not,=0A>   =
      extract the lucene document for the article from the archive=0A index=
=0A>         add the database_id, folders, and annotation fields to this=0A=
 object=0A>         add the document object to the lucene database index.=
=0A>=0A> Got a better idea on this?=0A>=0A> Thanks!!=0A>=0A>=0A> On Nov 26,=
 2007 5:33 PM, lucene user <luz290@gmail.com> wrote:=0A> > Folks=0A> >=0A> =
> I have some additional textual data that is user specific,=0A basically=
=0A> > annotations about documents. I would like to be able to do=0A> > **c=
ombined** searches, looking for some words in the document and=0A some=0A> =
> in my users' private annotations about that document. Any=0A suggestions=
=0A> > about how I should handle this? The annotations are changeable by=0A=
> > users at any time so we have to be ready to delete them and add=0A othe=
rs=0A> > at any time when the user does edit an annotation.=0A> >=0A> > Do =
I need a second Lucene index? Can I do a query against two=0A indexes=0A> >=
 at the same time? If so, how?=0A> >=0A> > The annotations will be very sma=
ll but highly volatile. The=0A database=0A> > of documents will grow large =
but nothing will be deleted from it.=0A> >=0A> > Thanks!=0A> >=0A>=0A=0A---=
------------------------------------------------------------------=0ATo uns=
ubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org=0AFor additional =
commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A    =
  ___________________________________________________________=0AYahoo! Answ=
ers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it=0Anow.=0Ah=
ttp://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org