lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Klaas <>
Subject Re: Generalized proximity query performance
Date Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:32:36 GMT
On 5-Oct-07, at 11:27 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:

> that's what i thought first too, and it is a problem i'd eventaully  
> like
> to tackle ... it was the part about "c" being in a differnet field  
> from
> "a" and "b" that confused me ... i don't know what that exactly is  
> being
> suggested here.

I'm thinking of the dismax model: you still want each keyword to  
match (though possibly in different fields).  I don't really think  
that that is appropriate to through into a single query class.   
Having separate match/boost clauses is better.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message