lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: field name limitations?
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:16:15 GMT
Should be fine.
The biggest issue may be the number of fields you are likely to have.
They are all kept in an in-memory map.  Also, during segment merging,
the field properties are merged in a linear fashion by stepping over
each one.

-Yonik

On 9/19/07, Karl Wettin <karl.wettin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm considering using complete class xpaths as field names. These
> might end up beeing several hundred letters long and contain some
> wierd letters. Should I expect running in to problems?
>
> Field names might look something like this:
>
> the.absolute:Class.Path/@attribute/tokenizationStrategyA
> the.absolute:Class.Path/@attribute/tokenizationStrategyB
> the.absolute:Class.Path/someMethod()/tokenizationStrategy
> the.absolute:Class.Path/denormalizedAssociation/@attribute/
> tokenizationStrategy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message