Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90131 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2007 00:49:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2007 00:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 64076 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 00:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64036 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 00:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64025 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2007 00:49:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:49:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chris.lu@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:49:23 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so407332nfc for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:49:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e0zyw/58GLWBAdgqy5Q7b5J48ymhlCvRbQhqgwNn8oJ9ix/858iaJcxHxUcdi8+d3hFxLp+JUYpQOEWJ7Z0rOw4/AX+D274EAXm8Z46OdbEkL0ZGKzq8LOD11t19GJ4ZWI/v4KxgiwziQygNaY2PVGNWaJpVWkI7CE2trLjbo18= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UjAvWfAmwZd1lb/tMK1P1bOLvQlNMd/QlPBaizP/ct1LisJ1uGMwvwNk8JmR2JydRI42q1R8YWaenjf6Wp1zcXLMaXvM3fpGu3MfUem7SeJclWGtxxcLBAHVI0HByq13crjlex0tnJeE0qB6Yzq6k6UCwamEFxR3+AHn1xVNMZ8= Received: by 10.78.193.5 with SMTP id q5mr1589039huf.1186447741132; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.155.16 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6e3ae6310708061749u2013246qf75fc01228b14096@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:49:01 -0700 From: "Chris Lu" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: speedup indexing In-Reply-To: <12026678.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4628d2a90708060439m19539f85h47288d92b4ca5d4a@mail.gmail.com> <12026678.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Seems this issue,LUCENE-834, is about query payload https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834 Can it help on indexing speed? -- Chris Lu ------------------------- Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application site: http://www.dbsight.net demo: http://search.dbsight.com Lucene Database Search in 3 minutes: http://wiki.dbsight.com/index.php?title=Create_Lucene_Database_Search_in_3_minutes On 8/6/07, testn wrote: > > 1. If you only search on docId field only, database might be a better > solution in this case. > 2. To improve indexing speed, you can consider using the trunk code which > includes LUCENE-834. The indexing speed will be faster by almost an order of > magnitude. > > > SK R wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I have indexed 5 fields and stored 2 of them(field Length is around > > 10000). My index is growing in nature and it is in GB. I need to get > > search > > result based on docID only. Scoring, additional sorting, delete and update > > are never used. None of complicated things required. > > In my testing , Search is wonderful , but index is somewhat slow. > > Please > > advice me how to improve indexing speed? > > I played with MergeFactor and MaxBufferedDocs. Norms are disabled. > > Is Lucene by default doing some more things more than my requirement? > > I'm also testing with FastAnalyzer which improves indexing speed. I > > appreciate more useful solutions? > > > > Regards > > RSK > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/speedup-indexing-tf4223630.html#a12026678 > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org