Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14594 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 18:28:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2007 18:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 64478 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2007 18:28:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64435 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2007 18:28:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64424 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2007 18:28:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:28:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mike.klaas@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.183] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:28:32 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so977221wah for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:28:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=KGtCOlpULcTGH/FwmOQGLGRdyd27z/VQbEqiPYBJ6wJgoR4FSUczOU6d/fkFx/0WctnvmAi3uHqwd8A+NepW5yIFiZ8039eY5sojj+p4CaVqlGMYlXIrpqWGOqzP7Tpwn9C3bGoSU1/pe78oz3FriXbfDP/w2T2eWyM1osvtqUE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=CvjE+P6np5VBt7zuvF7XrrYgjggPu+1WtlJvGXANUihkUZff9sGS/F9POJwtIFmLP0OibWgox8s99Cyd2XSmdGVZxN7J95r0UyJ3/XdOsHi75tmgDkdId3oTKb0WGo4Dfc6hSNw9LVs4J/9/C3tsu/LZcjwJd74nirHhae+nr88= Received: by 10.114.93.17 with SMTP id q17mr3227355wab.1186165689276; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.103? ( [24.82.155.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v35sm5000470wah.2007.08.03.11.28.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <46B30322.7080104@gmail.com> References: <46B30322.7080104@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <137CFCB5-FB31-460E-9AE1-850ED6D74885@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Klaas Subject: Re: Performance improvements using writer.delete vs reader.delete Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:28:08 -0700 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3-Aug-07, at 3:27 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > Also, IndexWriter probably buffers better than you would. If you > buffer a delete with IndexWriter and then add a document that would > be removed by that delete right after, when the buffered deletes > are flushed, your latest doc will not be removed. Its unlikely your > own buffer system would work so well. Is it? ISTM that any sane buffering system would account for that case. -Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org