lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Elschot <paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: scorers and filters
Date Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:33:40 GMT
On Friday 10 August 2007 20:27, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 8/10/07, John Wang <john.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Lucene Gurus:
> >
> >     More of a performance question:
> >
> > When you pass a Filter to a searcher to do a search, the searcher is
> > basically doing the full search and then intersect against the bitset 
given
> > by the filter. This seems wasteful when there are lotsa hits returned by 
the
> > scorer and filter only has only a few docs, e.g.
> >
> >      Running a MatchAllDocsQuery given a Filter with only 1 doc.
> >
> >     Right now Scorers don't know about filters, only the searchers do. And
> > scorers are doing most of the computation, but it seems scorers should 
make
> > use of the filters as the corpus before doing any score computation.
> >
> >     Seems to me this is an area that deserves some attention.

Yet another way to formulate the need for a common superclass.
The patch at the issue indicated below is an "extract superclass"
refactoring.
And the latest discussion on it is on java-dev today.

Regards,
Paul Elschot.

> 
> Skip based on the filter and the query...
> See the comments in FilteredQuery, and see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584
> 
> -Yonik
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message