Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33913 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2007 02:34:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2007 02:34:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 720 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2007 02:34:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 667 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2007 02:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 655 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2007 02:34:36 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:34:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.64.91] (HELO smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.64.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:34:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 91741 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2007 02:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.34?) (kkrugler@pacbell.net@63.200.72.123 with plain) by smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2007 02:34:11 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: xr6Hvt0VM1n5T2CNc42kN5U6Bd6MH285ofpWRRTx.sMhrRPO85wpOLzuTyAVhVlKhgWrslzh5A-- Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <11608209.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <11608209.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:34:02 -0700 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org From: Ken Krugler Subject: Re: Serving remote lucene client - RMI vs HTTP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >Hi Everyone, > >We are using lucene,nutch and spring framework to create a specialized >search engine. Due to growing traffic we are trying to scale. By doing some >tests we found out that the bottle neck was lucene search. We used some >heavy traffic simulation and logged the time taken by each portion of the >server response and found out that the bulk of the time was spent in >searching from lucene index. > >In order to accomodate higher traffic we are planning on splitting our >application in 2 portions: >1. Web application (on 1 machine) >2. Search application (one more than 1 machine) [snip] Nutch already supports distributed Lucene searchers, using Hadoop RPC. -- Ken -- Ken Krugler Krugle, Inc. +1 530-210-6378 "If you can't find it, you can't fix it" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org