Return-Path: 
 <java-user-return-29356-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82086 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2007 00:08:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2007 00:08:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 28238 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2007 00:08:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28192 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2007 00:08:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:java-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28179 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2007 00:08:30 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:08:30 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [69.147.95.91] (HELO smtp128.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com)
 (69.147.95.91)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:08:27 -0700
Received: (qmail 98645 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2007 00:08:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (nhira@cognocys.com@75.168.19.27
 with plain)
  by smtp128.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2007 00:08:05 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 
 XKqJoJoVM1mua866Kirr6ec4vEiIRDHXxBvJQi10.oOJUNAIV1EB7PvqswKrwSyBL.jPy456kg--
Subject: Re: Fine Tuning Lucene implementation
From: "N. Hira" <nhira@cognocys.com>
Reply-To: nhira@cognocys.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <c0c0e1d40707241658tfd64870v40a6b9431780fe98@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c0c0e1d40707241243y5ddfd5fai10381873a2d2bd64@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c0c0e1d40707241331i7be68a3dr27924a8e4f186427@mail.gmail.com>
	 <B6CD8741-E8F5-4D00-8579-DDD8944469AA@apache.org>
	 <c0c0e1d40707241428r44ee7926q7f9199687650baf3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <28F241F7-C4AD-414C-89D8-95AC22C0736B@apache.org>
	 <c0c0e1d40707241658tfd64870v40a6b9431780fe98@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Cognocys, Inc.
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:03 -0500
Message-Id: <1185322083.4593.54.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Could you show us the relevant source from doBodySearch()?

-h

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 19:58 -0400, Askar Zaidi wrote:
> I ran some tests and it seems that the slowness is from Lucene calls when I
> do "doBodySearch", if I remove that call, Lucene gives me results in 5
> seconds. otherwise it takes about 50 seconds.
> 
> But I need to do Body search and that field contains lots of text. The field
> is <contents>. How can I optimize that ?
> 
> thanks,
> Askar
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org