From java-user-return-28982-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Tue Jul 03 10:16:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36013 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2007 10:16:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2007 10:16:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 4725 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2007 10:16:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4663 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2007 10:16:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4584 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2007 10:16:17 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:16:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.233] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:16:13 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so1565665wxd for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:15:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lUJMwv9SsR/FBbojsY++x3hT6VCd3MvTWwvYKvCWitE/aB3nVkV6dQQumetRVPSLIM0vu9PQV9c2VZu2lly1qmZN8vgkoCHPbTLyxhUZga8b9aQKSwtqA/j326exdAEai4neTNO6Tb5wtNBqBZ9qyjwmf7iaQH2+2XDccEml5wA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SIvhtfRW47mk4ZdvYmk61E7qtCUOEmSluMaQ/UWNTFk1Gfvy1BC9VpwamHO05FLedvElM9q27R50fn/6ShXgyZo2YtTyPW0YF5nSJO1nNyjgIJ1hcv2RHBrvaze7lVf0FeMqvcBOUfTlkQIImjVP/M48nDbLZmXqreQgHkuaVxc= Received: by 10.70.87.5 with SMTP id k5mr9329644wxb.1183457752718; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? ( [216.66.114.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q26sm9971156ele.2007.07.03.03.15.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468A2184.6000502@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:14:28 -0400 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: highlighting phrase query References: <468969FE.3070807@gmail.com> <009d01c7bcf4$16c35290$970fda80@libraria.ucsf.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > has any one used Lucene-794? how stable it it. is it widely used in > industry. > > I have used it extensively and I would say it is extremely stable. As I said, much of the code from it is literally the same compiled code from Contrib Highlighter (It is really just a new Scorer class for the Contrib Highlighter). It is also the newest of the Highlighter issues in JIRA and I would say it is not even close to widely used in the industry. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org