lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dmitry" <dmitrytka...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA
Date Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:57:52 GMT
Folks,
why do we need full re0indexing during  the switch from DateFields to 
DateTools ? I'll have the same issue in future may be?
Thanks,
Dm
www.ejinz.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Knecht" <andreask@atlassian.com>
To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:32 AM
Subject: Upgrade of Lucene from 1.9.1 to 2.2.0 in JIRA


> Hi,
>
> We're about to upgrade Lucene from version 1.9.1 to version 2.2.0 in JIRA 
> <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira>. We've already switched from 
> DateFields to DateTools (which will require a complete re-index for all of 
> our customers).
> Are there any problems we should be aware of that could cause problems 
> with this upgrade? (which wont be fixed by a full re-index)
>
> Cheers,
>  Andreas
>
> -- 
> ATLASSIAN
> Our products help over 7,000 organisations in more than 88 countries to 
> collaborate. http://www.atlassian.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message