Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71222 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2007 14:12:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2007 14:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 82359 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2007 14:12:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82320 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2007 14:12:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82309 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2007 14:12:06 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:12:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:12:02 -0700 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I10uM-0000BI-A6 for java-user@lucene.apache.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:11:42 -0700 Message-ID: <11214251.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:11:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Sebastin To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: ways to minimize index size? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: sebasmtech@gmail.com References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Erick do u have any idea on this? jm-27 wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to make my index as small as possible. I noticed about > field.setOmitNorms(true), I read in the list the diff is 1 byte per > field per doc, not huge but hey...is the only effect the score being > different? I hardly mind about the score so that would be ok. > > And can I add to an index without norms when it has previous doc with > norms? > > Any other way to minimize size of index? Most of my fields but one are > Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.TOKENIZED and Field.TermVector.NO, one is > Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED and Field.TermVector.NO. I > tried compressing that one and size is reduced around 1% (it's a small > field), but I guess compression means worse performance so I am not > sure about applying that. > > thanks > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ways-to-minimize-index-size--tf3401213.html#a11214251 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org