Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30990 invoked from network); 24 May 2007 04:03:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2007 04:03:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 7546 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2007 04:03:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7514 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2007 04:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7503 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2007 04:03:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2007 21:03:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mitiaguin@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.233] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2007 21:03:40 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i1so403067nzh for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 21:03:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=urBJjPuYQE3O8RcKucrcg1fZWbozc6InLacrS0ux4bDvYN40bBfsuvPikIcjls1d+Z6tdbSaUoO50+rVL2weLZdUraDT7aLDyPUqYqffO+H0vgn2F8vzGumITPBom/vTHneqRmH3tngAol78JTkzzLHdSlBbh5VDVrKJp0r5BB4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pCFdHO+COk8GIFchYrk8M0ty6/vWMOp/pPOqXTKRDuAsLHNLDBoBDg+0JzEPt+ITqbgt6W9xtsnLa3i09DPQRbRxpZv86h47uyhaG7U51qYz4ULVpMOQ3W0zlw8ji5QBCJUZN4xSOG0umzArRYhcJajP+y0n52NzUmBB4p3MXG8= Received: by 10.64.250.7 with SMTP id x7mr2542139qbh.1179979400163; Wed, 23 May 2007 21:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.199.7 with HTTP; Wed, 23 May 2007 21:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:03:20 +1000 From: "Michael Mitiaguin" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS versus WITH_OFFSETS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What practical of using WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS ? Aren't WITH_OFFSETS sufficient and if iterate getStartOffset effectively gives the value from array element of getTermPositions ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org