Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of carlosjosepita@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=reRLWtKGsmUDNaZtDeJg9gCvvDFfbik9HCEM5ySc55zoRTHhKbXy1QMOq+zHXSMGjpqIc5KbszkzzhMQ7d6rexgkxiVXV0kLWccaJhOHc5oZPwV+YFapJQDNC5UnQk/c7ZjyRIM+hENy7HGhJIVnRlSgCQHcNwxr94glbbtOYA0=
Message-ID: <7798eaa0705241559o67839d2ej77929a99c609ced2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:59:04 -0300
From: "Carlos Pita" <carlosjosepita@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: maxDoc and arrays
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705241453500.1470@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_151177_24157737.1180047544131"
References: <7798eaa0705240941y5b420dd3sb2867ed86008dc19@mail.gmail.com>
	 <359a92830705241305h2aa4cd85pea7fde5b28c5213e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7798eaa0705241314n1cb2dc9fse01404d9bc6053ec@mail.gmail.com>
	 <359a92830705241322j252da92fn5379926cd6c93792@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7798eaa0705241327k739e5919id5e51783b6dc903@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c68e39170705241336l5d7a2836i83fa184bf68f67cd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7798eaa0705241350h66ec67cew6c30388d962e4880@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705241414190.28283@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
	 <7798eaa0705241439w1e262f41ve5c7338a0d6a7276@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705241453500.1470@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>

------=_Part_151177_24157737.1180047544131
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Nice, I will write the ids into a byte array with a DataOutputStream and
then marshal that array into a String with a UTF8 encoding. This way there
is no need for parsing or splitting, and the encoding is space efficient.
This marshaled String will be cached with a FieldCache. Thank you for your
suggestions! I will tell you how well this worked as soon as I've
implemented it.
Cheers,
Carlos

On 5/24/07, Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:
>
> : Mh, some of my fields are in fact multivaluated. But anyway, I could
> store
> : them as a single string and split after retrieval.
> : Will FieldCache work for the first search with some query or just for
> the
> : successive ones, for which the fields are already cached?
>
> The first time you access the cache, it will populate it for every
> document. ... it makes the first hit slow, but you can always force the
> first hit arbitrarily prior to using the IndexReader for "real" queries
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

------=_Part_151177_24157737.1180047544131--