Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60934 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2007 02:30:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2007 02:30:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 30502 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 02:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 30475 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 02:30:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 30460 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2007 02:30:39 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:30:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.196.97.108] (HELO web57004.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (66.196.97.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:30:30 -0700 Received: (qmail 49748 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Mar 2007 02:30:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=MjU+l+bnnJeXB1qc+i8MFDujnW9w1S0QEUUVFDX+PhBzxl3TtguV/N7xWibYSasnUv2DyKP3vwHZHl8ckZbsIM7wpOBQ462tKrlR0xyIZ88Jb1szYYETsmdZ9vTOrQXR/E7X+TEeNMZh/pxGotBZgfp/IJbNAjfuSqTk7jRb8Zc=; X-YMail-OSG: pHHLTAcVM1nZDZT1Lb89lf1zTYuNYmxzJIYYoZKZCtILbU5sASP19k15St1Ghs2y.CstAbB0FKPymbQQJrirOR3.iwYxi_G28b8QwiYzcNxy.l2gzec8CyKe9vwXjA-- Received: from [69.255.227.192] by web57004.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:30:09 PDT Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:30:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Xiaocheng Luan Subject: Re: Virtually merge two indexes? To: java-user@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <6e3ae6310703260858y43014848w95b9d65f6ea80ce2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1148727228-1174962609=:48436" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <794175.48436.qm@web57004.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1148727228-1174962609=:48436 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit How the indexes will be searched, do you need to search fields in both indexes? If the ParallelReader is not an attractive solution for you, finding a general solution may be difficult. Would it be possible to explore solutions that may work for your specific case? Just a thought. Xiaocheng Chris Lu wrote: Hi, Gurus, One thing I want to do is: one index has fields like [primary-key, not-so-frequently-updated-fields, large-content-fields,...], and another index has [primary-key, frequently-updated-fields]. The purpose is to make the indexing process faster by keeping large/stale fields in one index and small/frequently updated fields in another, linked via primary-key field. If I do so, is it possible to keep the index search the same? Parallel index reader may not cut it because it works only for different Documents into different indexes. What I want is the same Document spread on different indexes. -- Chris Lu ------------------------- Instant Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application site: http://www.dbsight.net demo: http://search.dbsight.com Lucene Database Search in 3 minutes: http://wiki.dbsight.com/index.php?title=Create_Lucene_Database_Search_in_3_minutes --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------- TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. --0-1148727228-1174962609=:48436--