Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79599 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 18:06:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 18:06:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 71849 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2007 18:06:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 71163 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2007 18:05:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54503 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2007 17:57:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of soshima@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=snna2+2THA+5Yx2aWMeB34jVbxxV+ltixc/bpBMy4l6ncuTtsRHBTeei0YvWoNFYSENZ1nrTq7lEFS9EB+bihIQ2DeyuBi6p8kLCUYEy4kGtWsIRfurkIs6ZtudQEgCl7Nmt1PeoOzWtzbBqlfi7HOOVgQ6+JKrboD4/erGqic8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qD3WqAXQCqOWfotCsKWPnqpBOj9mb5vqFCHbM3ABnVqPdY4ApFQ0Y1CN6SpSNgl6dKaNI8+UpmctejXTgT0Ti68YozPcWzz4vh9SQMI4R5AgEIdSMsU8sWlUjgtZ178qlJSDu2TladCTlI/L0M2f8mtdYWNESB3WVTvJ7In9oyc= Message-ID: <68780f5d0703281056m1eb89919j4692a13b9a60753d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:56:48 -0700 From: "Scott Oshima" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: index file size threshold affecting search performance? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13343_11640414.1175104608494" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13343_11640414.1175104608494 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline So I assumed a linear decay of performance as an index got bigger. For some reason when going from an index size of 1.89 to 1.95 gigs dramatically increased cpu across all of our servers. I was thinking of splitting the 1.95 index into 2 separate indexes and using a multisearcher on those parts? thanks. -scott ------=_Part_13343_11640414.1175104608494--