Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74792 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2007 03:41:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2007 03:41:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 95587 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2007 03:41:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95555 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2007 03:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95539 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2007 03:41:59 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:41:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.5] (HELO spunkymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:41:51 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [74.229.189.244]) by spunkymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271C887B34 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4FB2D9BE-0053-4289-9B57-CB92A3740248@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Grant Ingersoll Subject: Re: contrib/benchmark questions Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:41:27 -0400 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I think I see in the ReadTask that it is the res var that is being > incremented and would have to be altered. I guess I can go by > elapsed time, but even that seems slightly askew. I think this is > due to the withRetrieve() function overhead inside the for loop. I > have moved it out and will submit that change, too. > Moving it out of the loop made little diff. so I guess it is mostly just due to it being late and me being tired and not thinking clearly. B/c if I were, I would just realize that those operations are also retrieving documents... -Grant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org