Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95530 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2007 14:38:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 14:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 46386 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2007 14:37:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46365 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2007 14:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46349 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2007 14:37:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:37:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.229 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.229] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:37:47 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so2807238wri for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:37:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q9C8Bkh95Dzx+S42O3Olh6QxpgOR9P7XbzpWzHixKCDVxWQGgQo7MFuVbdGeyU5FB8/9suEohRBQkqlEz3gAKyC38se1S2AnbwGIr//7WKWoitwdAwzI2N8gap8wwzrc8QA+5ibI1AVOqTBO0KBiIQkLn8NXCmVBfwWHX1BIplE= Received: by 10.90.89.5 with SMTP id m5mr8662123agb.1171982247048; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:37:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.105? ( [216.66.114.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10sm12461244wrl.2007.02.20.06.37.25; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:37:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45DB0777.6030306@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:36:39 -0500 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene 2.1 and Luke References: <359a92830702200600s1ee464e4l8fc57a939bcee79e@mail.gmail.com> <45DB01FE.8030703@aps.org> In-Reply-To: <45DB01FE.8030703@aps.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This method gets you a ways, but some stuff still does not seem to work. Document reconstruction for one, at least for me. Arthur Smith wrote: > Luke works with Lucene 2.1, but you have to use the new lucene jar > explicitly - > > http://www.getopt.org/luke/ > |java -classpath luke.jar;lucene.jar org.getopt.luke.Luke > > |somebody will probably put together a 2.1 package soon. > > Arthur > > Erick Erickson wrote: >> Is there a Lucene 2.1 compatible version of Luke hanging around that >> I've >> overlooked or do I need to compile it myself? >> >> The change notes for Lucene 2.1 indicate index format changes, and, sure >> enough, when I tried to open a new index with my current version of >> Luke, it >> doesn't work (something about "not a lucene index" )... >> >> Erick >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org