Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54860 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 39139 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 39107 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 39096 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:12:38 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:12:29 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a27so484630nfc for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:12:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tgZpZY7idt/wDta0/98hPP8MW8CjRc52mqS08PIb6E1jzYMgcxBsGogHtiSGActONtEfhggEqSow26xlkFj96o749R2Avbyv5xOeEAScaVse1YGXVuwPilF0ehuQ44luhndgzCQZf3ku0KKPqoNPLsZBwtqbFSRjHrmrsxvylO4= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr2267466bud.1168272728344; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:12:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.162.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:12:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <359a92830701080812n113a934frd232f62aa6f603d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:12:07 -0500 From: "Erick Erickson" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Test my Lucene service In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_62604_2076670.1168272727706" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_62604_2076670.1168272727706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Well, my testing mostly consisted of capacity testing. I'm using XmlRpc as my communication mechanism and simply fired up a (configurable) number of threads to pound my search service with semi-random queries and measured the response time. Your results may vary depending on how your index is structured, the complexity of your queries, how you sort, etc.... Erick On 1/8/07, Dan Wiggin wrote: > > Hi luceners, I don't have any question today. > Simply I want to know how you test the efficiency of yours systems that > works over Lucene. > I think it will be a very interesting for all newbie (like me) in Lucene > world some advices in this point. > > Thanks in advance. > > ------=_Part_62604_2076670.1168272727706--