Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84511 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2006 07:42:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2006 07:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 36369 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2006 07:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 36338 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2006 07:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 36327 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2006 07:42:24 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:42:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lukas.vlcek@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:42:13 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n28so3767970nfc for ; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:41:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mjkdrZIKb9NQpHj4xoF2iCY+k8Q6UZQYSqvRnvEknQdDgbM8zL+OhPYXrJFM8z3QU7pQCWRvsmQvu1yynraaZaQTlp8Lw/gAfS16c6vnScV4nlgRFSktewr522XzfSaIdTLS2zNoUos8wCuKNzuOafhCDj6Axwp+4L+D1CBhZ8M= Received: by 10.82.141.4 with SMTP id o4mr1419363bud.1165218111947; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.147.8 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 23:41:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52c3ddca0612032341pe9f454enb5271e1b73a965ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:41:51 +0100 From: "Lukas Vlcek" Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: lucene - general question In-Reply-To: <4fe781a50612032328q22e97299g96d9b78e57f787aa@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_34512_962747.1165218111920" References: <4fe781a50612032328q22e97299g96d9b78e57f787aa@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_34512_962747.1165218111920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Babu, Sorry but I don't see any point in using Lucene if you don't need search functionality. Also for parsing XML files I would consider using some scripting language (as opposed to pure Java based solution). The reason is that scripting languages can be more effectire when simplicity of result code is important and as of Java 6 they can run right inside JVM - so integration with you java code is very simple. Just my 2 cents. Lukas On 12/4/06, Eshwaramoorthy Babu wrote: > > Hi , > > we have a requirement to compare 2 xml files and generate > result(reconcilation report). > The xml file size is 6MB each and the flrmat is as below > > 123 > 123 > > > > I have to implement the below logic > > Number of matching ID'S in both xml > Number of non matching ID'S in both xml > Number of non matching ID'S in both xml > > I am planning to use digester and lucene for my above requirement. > > Is my desicion of using lucene correct? or is there any bettwr approch > for > my above problem. > > Thanks, > Babu > > ------=_Part_34512_962747.1165218111920--