Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <45882BB2.4090107@syr.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:13:06 -0500
From: Steven Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu>
User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.4-GroupWise-IMAP-fix (Windows/20060619)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene id generation
References: <20061219152214.203.qmail@web28007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061219152214.203.qmail@web28007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Antonio Bruno wrote:
> To use but directly the docId would render efficient and fastest the
> searches much. Thoughts to the possibility of being able to apply a
> first CachingWrapperFilter F1 on an index and a second
> CachingWrapperFilter F2 on an other index and after to make (F1 AND
> F2) and to even extract the info of interest only from an index. It
> would be most powerful� Could be made the moment one what of this
> type?

In the Lucene sandbox, ChainedFilter combines filters with Boolean
operations:

http://www.netlikon.de/docs/lucene-2.0.0/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/misc/ChainedFilter.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org