Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83080 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2006 19:25:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2006 19:25:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11621 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 19:25:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11590 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 19:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11579 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2006 19:25:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25:47 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a4so182599nfc for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Y6pRIM5aaJZB3eIIWQCmo2aEBn5mFBFYQIjb//Ah9lg/ZBSMvoAlrjUe6ZLYctoNv/4uTeti7SbPS5SKexTfkNDKOvI7EMThHSxhLnZno7E8j1j6pG+YEEicJh1NYmh/JA5BIzRVsDwaVzvQYr/W7DQ7TEGA7ZT4WenVBaKZHuE= Received: by 10.82.142.9 with SMTP id p9mr812011bud; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.149.12 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:25:25 -0400 From: "Yonik Seeley" Sender: yseeley@gmail.com To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, simon.willnauer@gmail.com Subject: Re: What is the advantage of setting using compund file to false In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <452B7475.4000003@artnology.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 08f5030e1b6edabd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/10/06, Simon Willnauer wrote: > On the other hand, the advantage of compound file appears in > searching. In my testing from some time ago, this wasn't the case. non-compound indexes were faster to search too. If you get too many open files, - configure your OS to increase the number of open files - increase maxBufferedDocs to increase the size of the smallest segments and thus decrease the total number of segments - decrease the merge factor some to further reduce the number of files (this will slow indexing some, but speed up searching on non-optimized indicies). -Yonik http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org