Return-Path: 
 <java-user-return-23684-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38921 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 19:20:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 19:20:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 81054 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 19:19:55 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81028 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 19:19:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:java-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81017 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 19:19:55 -0000
Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org)
 (140.211.166.84)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:19:55 -0700
Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org
 header.from=erickerickson@gmail.com; domainkeys=good
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No,
 hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE
DomainKey-Status: good
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing
 draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
Received: from [64.233.166.179] ([64.233.166.179:40047]
 helo=py-out-1112.google.com)
	by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP
	id 2F/D5-24395-95661254 for <java-user@lucene.apache.org>;
 Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:19:54 -0700
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id s49so1407609pyc
        for <java-user@lucene.apache.org>;
 Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=kGVcuYRj1ds6+Q9fjolHd5gVUn78x3faSVSuHWMm7isB71ZfXdwm6wIUXc/LEv5EZeoITQXl7QdYNkQjEF+RzszxJ8v2Xw2zFJRTNNib/RxhicQQ68KMbBezYCNv7InWLLOqdt1X44tRNDt8k3pK09yga2M7B9FZ0iPhM0XwaAQ=
Received: by 10.35.78.13 with SMTP id f13mr8397951pyl;
        Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.8.5 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <359a92830610021219u7107aac5lffa2950a5fab71a1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:19:50 -0400
From: "Erick Erickson" <erickerickson@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search in HTML code
In-Reply-To: <7b2520d40610020550k466f230ax80ab6cd2f8ebb495@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_64263_17717154.1159816790821"
References: <7b2520d40610020550k466f230ax80ab6cd2f8ebb495@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

------=_Part_64263_17717154.1159816790821
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I guess the thundering silence is rooted in the problem statement. I have a
hard time understanding how this index is used. By storing things this way,
you'll force the user to know the *exact* format of anything she's looking
for. That is, it's hard to search for <option name="test" value="32"> and
get docs containing both <option name="test"> and <option name="test"
value="32"> as hits. You could do some fancy things with filters and regular
expressions (RegexTermEnum) for instance, but I'd hesitate to recommend that
until I understood your problem a little more.

Perhaps a better thing would be to give us a short statement of the problem
you're trying to solve and see what responses you get from that...

Not very helpful, I know, but it's a start.

Erick

On 10/2/06, John Bugger <john.bugger@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I've indexed HTML pages and stored html codes as UN_TOKENIZED fields. So,
> I
> need to search for specific tags in those documents,
> for example: <option name="test">
> Do I need to write some custom analyzer or something like that?
> Please help me!
>
>

------=_Part_64263_17717154.1159816790821--