lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "sachin" <sachin.kha...@noemacorp.com>
Subject RE: Advantage of putting lucene index in RDBMS
Date Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:49:07 GMT
I feel implementing the Lucene inside the RDBMS is nothing but
implementation of following interfaces :

TermDocs
TermVector
TermPositions


-----Original Message-----
From: Karel Tejnora [mailto:karel@tejnora.cz] 
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:11 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Advantage of putting lucene index in RDBMS

One think, generally use RDBM for the STORED fields is good idea because 
every segment merging / optimize copies those data once or twice (cfs).

I'm thinking about to put STORED fields in extra file and put pointers 
in cfs. Delete will just mark document as delete. And new operation 
omptimize_full
deletes and corrects pointers.


Karel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message