Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17291 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2006 21:49:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2006 21:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 91560 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2006 21:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91532 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2006 21:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91521 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2006 21:49:22 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:22 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=hossman_lucene@fucit.org; spf=permerror X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received-SPF: error (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain fucit.org from 169.229.70.167 cause and error) Received: from [169.229.70.167] ([169.229.70.167:35558] helo=rescomp.berkeley.edu) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id D3/30-02891-FD1FA154 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:20 -0700 Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 36B465B766; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263837F403; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:49:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, Charlie Zhao Subject: Re: strange behavior 4 query term boost In-Reply-To: <677109849.20060927164152@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <451AE844.5060606@isoco.com> <359a92830609271416h5f02fee5y49425e3fa756776e@mail.gmail.com> <677109849.20060927164152@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I assume you mean that the set of matches is hte same, but the scores (and possibly the order) are different correct? The IndexSearcher.explain methods should help make the reason clear -- compare the output for each query when looking at the same docIds. I suspect what you'll find is that with the low boost values, the fieldNorms become more significant resulting in a change of order. : Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:41:52 -0500 : From: charliecmo@gmail.com : Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, Charlie Zhao : To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: strange behavior 4 query term boost : : Hello, : : I don't understand why the following two queries give totally different results. : : term1^5 term2^6 term3^7 : : term1^0.0005 term2^0.0006 term3^0.0007 : : Can anyone explain? Thanks. : : (lucene2.0, using TopDocs) : : -- : Thanks, : Charlie : : : : : --------------------------------------------------------------------- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org : For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org : -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org