Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lucene.developer@googlemail.com
 designates 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=googlemail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=oxV/TfF403L7zFFMj00rwu1NK30i5GFDgx4mYNAi4+XT3iUuYUOI93qCG/83ODII2WabMDpKn/KmcRj2UMYQTgvz6a30mgqFJYgVALgykw+BPCzXdCzRMs5izLBYaFr13jyjLj7jacJzubrhAhysVDVlP3Ti1W1tFM+tl+JIvt8=
Message-ID: <a218b3050607200031x62d9d695ub10db8d642c274ca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:31:23 +0200
From: lude <lucene.developer@googlemail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0
In-Reply-To: <200607191259.29548.nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_109789_27756887.1153380683988"
References: <a218b3050607181153k73be8315q7cd63d2a79cd9c06@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200607182058.56551.nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com>
	 <a218b3050607190332k71f5942cjcd8f6565e403daff@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200607191259.29548.nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com>

------=_Part_109789_27756887.1153380683988
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

> As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9 ....

Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene
Version 1.4.3.


On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalev=E9e <nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com> wrote:
>
> Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a =E9crit:
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > thanks for answering.
> >
> > You wrote:
> > > And about Luke, ASAIK too, is a Lucene-2 app, so it will be able to
> read
> > > a
> >
> > 1.4
> >
> > What do you mean?
> > The luke website stated:  "Current version is 0.6. It has been released
> on
> > 16 Feb 2005."
> > How can Luke be a Lucene-2 application if it was released on Feb 2005?
>
> Yes, I should have not used the word Lucene-2 application, sorry.
> BTW, about the index format described here :
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html
> there is only concern about if Lucene >=3D 1.9 or if Lucene <=3D 1.4. As =
Luke
> was
> release with a Lucene-1.9, it will work with Lucene 2.0 index beacause a
> index 1.9 and an index 2.0 are the same.
>
> Nicolas.
>
> >
> > lude
> >
> > On 7/18/06, Nicolas Lalev=E9e <nicolas.lalevee@anyware-tech.com> wrote:
> > > Le Mardi 18 Juillet 2006 20:53, lude a =E9crit:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere:
> > > >
> > > > 1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version 1.4.3=
and
> > > > 2.0? 2.) Is it possible to use the old Luke-Tool with a new lucene =
2
> > >
> > > index?
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > lude
> > >
> > > ASAIK, the format changed, but in a compatible way : a Lucene-2 app
> will
> > > be
> > > able to read a 1.4 index. The index format change is there :
> > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html
> > >
> > > And about Luke, ASAIK too, is a Lucene-2 app, so it will be able to
> read
> > > a 1.4
> > > index.
> > >
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

------=_Part_109789_27756887.1153380683988--