Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58344 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2006 08:43:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2006 08:43:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 44567 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2006 08:43:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 44547 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2006 08:43:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 44536 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2006 08:43:26 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 01:43:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 01:43:25 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1G6kPY-0008Ou-UG for java-user@lucene.apache.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 01:43:04 -0700 Message-ID: <5552408.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 01:43:04 -0700 (PDT) From: neils To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Sorting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: neils@gmx.net X-Nabble-From: neils X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Lucene sort hits by relevance as default. Cause i would like to sort them by a special string field and not by relevance i was thinking about dropping the sorting by relevance as default and implement sorting by alphabetic order. Reason that sorting by alpabetic order takes a lot of time. Makes this sense and how can this be done? Or is there another "fast" way to sort by alphabetic order ? Currently I'm using lucene 1.9.1 (dotnet). The indexsize is currently about 2 GB and index is split in two parts and are accessed by a parallelreader. Hopefully you can give me a tip if there is a way :-)) Thanks a lot :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sorting-tf2019404.html#a5552408 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org