lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Erick Erickson" <>
Subject Re: Empty fields ...
Date Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:36:36 GMT
Ok, I'm confused again, not unusual.... To create a bitset for the following


why invert the bitset?

a token containing the empty string matches documents that
> contain that token

Isn't this exactly what he wants? Or am I mis-reading this? I'm reading it
as "any document that contains a ZIP will match a token containing the empty
string"..... Or am I getting tokens and terms all mixed up?

what you want to do is create a bitset for every document that has a value
> in that field, and then invert the BitSet.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message