Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92979 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2006 04:05:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2006 04:05:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 68876 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2006 04:05:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 68850 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2006 04:05:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 68839 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2006 04:05:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:05:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of heritrix.lucene@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.237] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:05:37 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so319468wri for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:05:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jGVw8/7DezT6YJ8kSAnLEkwDsSOz78Sxt59LeLTfijPR+G3IFnwh70esgQzi0ByO1xpzebYtqFtrKXu+XpgccClbHILmLRaTjzMiZwqJetX4qFang1WWkA9btBZEcgsxgFvQytJvVRHQY6tPkrbbkYTZKvvhlsbizwA+1DnVjTk= Received: by 10.64.125.17 with SMTP id x17mr881211qbc; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.183.15 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:35:16 +0530 From: heritrix.lucene To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: addIndexes() is taking infinite time ... In-Reply-To: <449A1600.80304@nuix.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1009_14854263.1150949116839" References: <20060620154249.20756.qmail@web50303.mail.yahoo.com> <449A1600.80304@nuix.com.au> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_1009_14854263.1150949116839 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline No. I haven't tried. Today i can try it. One thing that i m thinking is that what role does the file system plays here. I mean is there any difference on if i am doing indexing on FAT32 or i am on EXT3??? i'll have to find it out.... Can anybody put some light on this?? With regards On 6/22/06, Daniel Noll wrote: > > heritrix.lucene wrote: > > hi Otis, > > Now this time it took 10 Hr 34 Min. to merge the indexes. During merging > i > > noticed it was not completey using the CPU. I have 512MB RAM. and here i > > found it used upto the 256 MB. > > > > Are there some more possibilities to make it more fast ... > > Have you tested how fast the same process runs on different storage > devices? It sounds like you're bound by IO, and perhaps finding ways to > speed up the storage (RAID striping?) would help speed things up. > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Noll > > Nuix Pty Ltd > Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2 9280 0699 > Web: http://www.nuix.com.au/ Fax: +61 2 9212 6902 > > This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not > the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, > distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this > message or attachment is strictly prohibited. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > ------=_Part_1009_14854263.1150949116839--