Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5066 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 14:04:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 14:04:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 37993 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 14:04:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37950 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 14:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37922 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2006 14:04:31 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:04:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [128.230.18.29] (HELO mailer.syr.edu) (128.230.18.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:04:30 -0700 Received: from [128.230.84.138] (syru84-138.syr.edu) by mailer.syr.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.154B35EE@mailer.syr.edu>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:04:09 -0400 Message-ID: <44980059.2030903@syr.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:04:09 -0400 From: Steven Rowe User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (Windows/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Exact Match Searches and Stop Words References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hugh Ross wrote: > The problem is that the standard analyzer removes the stop word (i.e. > "of") before indexing and searching. Is there an > workaround for this? See my response to a similar question here: In short, an indexing-side workaround was once applied and then retracted to the code base, but a query-side fix is also required, and has yet to be applied. Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org