lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus Falck" <marcus.fa...@observer.se>
Subject SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics
Date Thu, 18 May 2006 15:33:53 GMT
But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache!


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Yonik Seeley [mailto:yseeley@gmail.com] 
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 17:24
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

On 5/18/06, Marcus Falck <marcus.falck@observer.se> wrote:
> Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ?

Yes, but Solr handles the mechanics of warming up a new searcher in
the background to avoid those lengthy first-time hits to the
FieldCache and norms, and it warms any configured caches based on
previous requests.

There is still the issue of data freshness... you don't want to open a
new searcher too often (less than once a minute probably).

-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message