lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus Falck" <marcus.fa...@observer.se>
Subject SV: Sort problematics
Date Thu, 18 May 2006 15:19:46 GMT
Ok.
I just set up a machine running solr and now I will index up a couple of gigabytes to see
the difference in performance (using a sort).

But since my "real" index will be around 2TB in size I don't think sorting is the right way
to go? I pretty sure I will have to modify the ranking.

And yes the data must be instantly available.

/
Marcus






-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: karl wettin [mailto:kalle@snigel.net] 
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 16:48
Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Ämne: Re: Sort problematics

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 16:22 +0200, Marcus Falck wrote:
> Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ?

Solr comes with more cache.

Is it a requirement that the new data is instantly available?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message