Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95658 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2006 15:10:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2006 15:10:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 85990 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2006 15:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85968 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2006 15:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85957 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2006 15:10:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:10:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [17.250.248.185] (HELO smtpout.mac.com) (17.250.248.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:10:13 -0700 Received: from mac.com (smtpin03-en2 [10.13.10.148]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout15/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k3RF9pXR028038 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [131.111.248.102] (md403.quns.cam.ac.uk [131.111.248.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin03/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k3RF9mal021250 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <92BA9B69-C5E3-45FD-945E-C64581190D0B@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Lucene Mailing List From: Michael Dodson Subject: re: multiple indexes Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:09:45 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I know it is possible to query against multiple indexes, but is it possible to create a composite query in which part of the query is against one index and part is against another (similar to querying against a default and a second field)? for example index1:query1 AND index2:query2 I thought about querying them separately and combining the scores but would like to use lucene's scoring formula all the way through for consistency and for evaluation purposes. Thanks, Mike D --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org