lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raghavendra Prabhu" <rrpra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Compass Framework
Date Sat, 08 Apr 2006 08:23:20 GMT
Database implementation of the index is always bound to be slow compared to
storing it on the filesystem.

Probably the group which stores indexes into Berkley DB should be able to
give you a performance measuer of what will happen you store indexex in
databases.

Rgds
Prabhu


On 4/8/06, Marios Skounakis <mscoon@exis.com.gr> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently came across the Compass Framework, which is built on top of
> lucene. I
> am interested in it because it stores the lucene index in an RDBMS and
> provides
> transaction support for index updates (it also has several other features
> but
> this is the part I'm mostly interested in).
>
> I wanted to know if any people here have had any experience with compass
> and what
> they think about it. Is the database implementation of the index fast
> enough and
> does it introduce any additional issues/problems?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Marios
> ---- Msg sent via eXis webmail
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message