Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90863 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2006 13:27:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2006 13:27:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 31241 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 13:28:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31209 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 13:28:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31198 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2006 13:28:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:28:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of samurujackson@googlemail.com designates 64.233.184.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.198] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:28:16 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so1361385wra for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:27:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DP0lPNYr4ivaLFg9G0vN7sQmWFb54hgq+1gyKlWXw1UYgSjdIrOyTCaIFnxiXZlenh7W1ky0oNBKFuNrFuzjOzUO5mB1qnAD2VtMUfQxq/2OX3gCdhIswop+bn6JSjpF86h5gVTEv2zupY3J77lln5QLJWscEchdvMbvI80QaxM= Received: by 10.64.184.5 with SMTP id h5mr2522851qbf; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:27:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.235.6 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 05:27:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:27:54 +0100 From: "Samuru Jackson" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Distributed Lucene.. In-Reply-To: <440BD048.4060806@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <440BD048.4060806@aol.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Does it make any sense ? Also would like to know if there are other ways > to distribute lucene's indexing/searching ? I'm interested in such a distributed architecture too. What I have got in mind is some kind of lucene index cluster where you have got several machines having subindexes in memory. So if you have got a a searchquery the machines should perfom fast because the index is in memory and no hard disk access is performed. Is there anything like this available? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org