Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7592 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2006 21:30:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2006 21:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 48471 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2006 21:30:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48435 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2006 21:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48424 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2006 21:30:43 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:30:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of peterlkeegan@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.205] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:30:42 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so148070wra for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:30:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=STH82Vercz0th+HQuZSZh8LV/ZF+HMnvtjL5ppGjcOSdpDLOx/X52rByE1/pa2gIHZAUC+ESFF6uf2r/T4m8qFCnoOrLrCa0gCaMsV3mHx1fborB6X3Lny8YYG1w/EkWuLod21VMc/GH/fo1SfctT6yJN4xM0AMDzybf5uqkriQ= Received: by 10.54.92.1 with SMTP id p1mr691750wrb; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:30:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.123.8 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:30:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:30:21 -0500 From: "Peter Keegan" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Throughput doesn't increase when using more concurrent threads In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17107_4179745.1140730221937" References: <43DD6821.8020302@nuix.com.au> <88c6a6720602231148v520b3be6uab8cfd7fb48899a9@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_17107_4179745.1140730221937 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Yonik, We're investigating both approaches. Yes, the resources (and permutations) are dizzying! Peter On 2/23/06, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Wow, some resources! > Would it be cheaper / more scalable to copy the index to multiple > boxes and loadbalance requests across them? > > -Yonik > > On 2/23/06, Peter Keegan wrote: > > Since I seem to be cpu-bound right now, I'll be trying a 16-cpu system > next > > (32 with hyperthreading), on LinTel. I may give JRockit another go > around > > then. > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > ------=_Part_17107_4179745.1140730221937--