Return-Path: 
 <java-user-return-19106-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14088 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2006 17:26:55 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2006 17:26:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 5248 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 17:26:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5057 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 17:26:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:java-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5046 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2006 17:26:49 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:26:49 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gusk@altrec.com designates
 63.251.175.92 as permitted sender)
Received: from [63.251.175.92] (HELO mta.altrec.com) (63.251.175.92)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:26:48 -0800
Received: from localhost (mta.altrec.com [127.0.0.1])
	by mta.altrec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A2D7BB9C
	for <java-user@lucene.apache.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta.altrec.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mta.altrec.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 24083-07 for <java-user@lucene.apache.org>;
 Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from denali.altrec.com (arachne.altrec.com [63.251.175.11])
	by mta.altrec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8F37BB78
	for <java-user@lucene.apache.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by DENALI with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
	id <WF7DX6V8>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:27:36 -0800
Message-ID: <55903574BD75D311B8A0009027CCC22B0529DC9C@DENALI>
From: Gus Kormeier <gusk@altrec.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: IndexSearcher
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:27:35 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Maybe too general a question, but is there anything about creating an
IndexSearcher( directory) object that would make the instantiation really
slow?


I have one index where the instantiation is very fast, to the point where I
don't need to do any pooling.  A new index I have created, takes a very long
time to create the IndexSearcher object.  With a 30mb index, it can take
about 30 seconds just to instantiate an IndexSearcher().  It almost seems
like it is reading the index at that point.


The only difference between the indexes has been the # of fields indexed.
The newer one only having one field indexed.

Any ways to speed up that instantiation? Or do I have to use a pooling
system?

Thanks for any suggestions,
-Gus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org