Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85931 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 21:13:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 21:13:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 55321 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 21:13:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54431 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 21:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54420 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2005 21:13:35 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:13:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of aseldawy@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.199] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:13:29 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s8so257009wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:13:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L0sQlV2SehEc+MxCnG7GDCf3lFUhZ6HElrNVXBCvR5q6rGqwZyOVxO8+/oh9s0faAOtz9inT1AL4QEdgKWNvJgN0cWGuGfiGGBF9TOxvKbgkcfh141KyGkQw88ddWA2FxKgTRP+4JYB1hDceJG4wMtimpiXwzPYm6mr2pGHkw7w= Received: by 10.70.24.6 with SMTP id 6mr4232673wxx; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:13:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.23.14 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:13:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:13:13 +0200 From: Ahmed El-dawy Reply-To: aseldawy@yahoo.com To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple terms with the same position in PhraseQuery In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436B2181.9060708@culture.gouv.fr> <36F88F1E-7449-4DD5-B9C7-D06011CCADAF@ehatchersolutions.com> <200511041945.02428@danielnaber.de> <35CFDB73-73D1-4088-9278-A74186C9A059@ehatchersolutions.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I have used the PhrasePrefixQuery but it has some problems. It sometimes throw an exception (OperationNotAllowed) when it is added to a boolean query with required flag set. Also it sometimes throws a null pointer exception and I don't know why. I am trying to get the latest version (from SVN) but I can't do it. I need your help. How can I checkout the project? I use eclipse and it asks me for these information Host: ----- Repository Path: ----- User: ----- Password: ------ Connection type: (pserver | ext | extssh) port: (default | custom) Thanks very much On 11/5/05, Erik Hatcher wrote: > On 4 Nov 2005, at 23:08, Ahmed El-dawy wrote: > > BTW, I think there's a newer version of Lucene that I can't get, my > > version is 1.4.3 and I didn't find any newer version at the site. For > > example, the QueryParser in my version doesn't care with term position > > and I had to override it by myself to support this. > > You may be referring to the CVS version, but I want to release my app. > > with a stable version. > > For the record, Subversion trunk (no longer CVS) is stable and being > used in many production projects already. > > The only difference between Subversion trunk and a released version > is the time and effort someone has taken to build it, package it, > sign it, and upload it (and of course a consensus vote authorizing > it). While I know that many environments demand that such blessing > has occurred, I cannot say that I altogether understand it. I much > prefer, personally, to be on the trunk and know that any issues I do > happen to encounter can be easily reported, likely fixed if > identified specifically enough, fixed, and integrated back into my > projects right away. > > I certainly do feel a bit bad that I'm not personally being > aggressive about pushing a new release, but please don't let my > insane schedule hold you back from using the latest and best version > of Lucene. > > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > -- regards, Ahmed Saad --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org