Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <437CB806.5080108@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:04:06 -0800
From: Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Memory Usage
References: <437298F1.40205@nuix.com.au>
 <F0A8D1EE-3490-469B-ADE6-8210CD06215F@rectangular.com>
 <4377F240.4090004@nuix.com.au>
 <5E565757-B7D3-4CC7-A92A-CE8A7A94E967@rectangular.com>
 <4378C708.2070909@apache.org> <437AB3DD.8060704@nuix.com.au>
 <437B9DB7.4010009@apache.org> <437BBC15.4090901@nuix.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <437BBC15.4090901@nuix.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Daniel Noll wrote:
> I actually did throw a lot of terms in, and eventually chose "one" for 
> the tests because it was the slowest query to complete of them all 
> (hence I figured it was already spending some fairly long time in I/O, 
> and would be penalised the most.)  Every other query was around 7ms 
> before tweaking, and the tweak increased them all to somewhere around 
> 10ms but that's still a lot faster than "one" was even at its fastest.

Different terms are affected differently by this tweak, so results for a 
single term don't reveal much.

Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org