Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of TAigner@wescodist.com designates
 12.29.179.202 as permitted sender)
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Optimize vs non optimized index
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:17:10 -0500
Message-ID: <14FBF41EF1411B45B2EC4ADEAC53D13104600C19@MAIL01.wescodist.com>
Thread-Topic: Optimize vs non optimized index
Thread-Index: AcXq5TDCmYek9ziRQO2hf5NLpgqtNAAFfB8A
From: "Aigner, Thomas" <TAigner@WescoDist.com>
To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org>

Thanks for the advice Yonik.. I do have deletions in my 1.4.3 index. I
downloaded the lucene-1.9-rc1-dev.jar file to give it a go and after
upgrading a few of the methods from the deprecated methods, I keep
getting this error: class "org.apache.lucene.document.Field$Store"'s
signer information does not match signer information of other classes in
the same package

If I can get this to go, I will retest.
Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:yseeley@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 2:37 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Optimize vs non optimized index

Do you have any deletions in the non-optimized version of the index?
If so, a bug was fixed recently that made for some very slow queries:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-454

You could also try a smaller mergeFactor, which would slow indexing,
but decrease the number of segments, and hence speed searching.

-Yonik
Now hiring -- http://forms.cnet.com/slink?231706

On 11/16/05, Aigner, Thomas <TAigner@wescodist.com> wrote:
> Howdy all, have a quick question for you...
>
> I am seeing quite a difference between optimized index and one that is
> not optimized.  I have read a few papers that say that it shouldn't
> matter, but I am seeing 7X speed or better when the index is
optimized.
> Is it possible that I am creating the original index incorrectly?
>
> The reason why I am asking it due to the space it takes to optimize an
> index.  I have an index that takes up about 2.5G, but when I optimize
> it, it will take an additional 5G of space to do this (so 7.5G to
> optimize it).  I was wondering if perhaps if this is the norm or not.
>
> Thanks ahead of time,
> Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org