Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97866 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2005 00:22:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2005 00:22:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 46329 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2005 00:22:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46289 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2005 00:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46272 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2005 00:22:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:22:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [81.103.221.47] (HELO mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:24:21 -0800 Received: from aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20051201002229.HKVY21883.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:22:29 +0000 Received: from jhi ([81.98.13.34]) by aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP id <20051201002229.XLMU16192.aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@jhi> for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:22:29 +0000 Message-ID: <001c01c5f60d$5089c0e0$b900a8c0@jhi> From: "gekkokid" To: References: Subject: Re: Lucene + LSI Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:22:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N sorry have to ask - whats LSI - " latent semantic indexing"? _gk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lorenzo Viscanti" To: ; Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Lucene + LSI It depends on the kind of implementation you are thinking of. You can use Lucene to create the inputs to the LSI, and then use them in your own system. I've written that code and it works, for searches and clustering. But if you are figuring out an LSI enhanced Lucene search system (based on a specific Similarity implementation?), I have to tell you that It wouldn't be so easy to integrate LSI into the Lucene's APIs. Lorenzo On 12/1/05, Chandana wrote: > > Have any one implemented LSI in Lucene? > Kindly let me know how hard/easy it is. > > thanks > chandana > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org