lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mordo, Aviran (EXP N-NANNATEK)" <aviran.mo...@lmco.com>
Subject RE: OutOfMemoryError on addIndexes()
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:36:34 GMT
You can still have the complete date as a separate field, and sort or
filter by it, just don't use this field in your query.

Aviran
http://www.aviransplace.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Schwartz [mailto:tony@simpleobjects.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:32 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: OutOfMemoryError on addIndexes()

Is this a viable solution?
Doesn't this make sorting and filtering much more complex and much more
expensive as well?

Tony Schwartz
tony@simpleobjects.com


> On Wednesday 17 August 2005 22:49, Paul Elschot wrote:
>> > the index could potentially be huge.
>> >
>> > So if this is indeed the case, it is a potential scalability 
>> > bottleneck in lucene index size.
>>
>> Splitting the date field into century, year in century, month, day, 
>> hour, seconds, and milliseconds will reduce the total number of
indexed terms to 2300 or so.
>
> 1300 is closer, I forgot that I had split off the centuries.
>
> Regards,
> Paul Elschot
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message