lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Elschot <paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: OutOfMemoryError on addIndexes()
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:37:04 GMT
On Thursday 18 August 2005 14:32, Tony Schwartz wrote:
> Is this a viable solution?
> Doesn't this make sorting and filtering much more complex and much more expensive as
well?

Sorting would have to be done on more than one field.
I would expect that to be possible.

As for filtering: would you need (milli)second resolution for that?

> 
> Tony Schwartz
> tony@simpleobjects.com
> 
> 
> > On Wednesday 17 August 2005 22:49, Paul Elschot wrote:
> >> > the index could potentially be huge.
> >> >
> >> > So if this is indeed the case, it is a potential scalability
> >> > bottleneck in lucene index size.
> >>
> >> Splitting the date field into century, year in century, month, day, hour, seconds,
and
> >> milliseconds will reduce the total number of indexed terms to 2300 or so.
> >
> > 1300 is closer, I forgot that I had split off the centuries.

I still forgot the minutes.

Regards,
Paul Elschot


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message