lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <p...@activemath.org>
Subject Re: performance: gcj, sun, ibm ?
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:33:04 GMT
I heard recently that the Wikipedia team actually switched off of using 
Java lucene because of Java licenses (which we know isn't that perfect) 
and went on to .NET mono (or something like this) where an 
implementation of Lucene has been fine and stable, more stable than 
using gcc, it seems.

paul


Le 4 août 05, à 16:44, Martin Rode a écrit :

> hello all,
>
> lucene is already pretty fast, but i was wondering if you guys have 
> experience with using gcj (on linux). how much faster is it for 
> indexing? personally i have best performance with java-ibm, at least 
> under linux.
>
> it would be interesting to hear how your experiences are.
>
> thanks in advance,
> martin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message