lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Index with more than one analyzer?
Date Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:54:00 GMT
If you go with one index and distinct fields for the 3 variations you
mentioned, then you can perhaps make use of PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper.

Otis


--- Andrew Boyd <andrew.boyd@mindspring.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>   When I first started my project I was creating 3 indexes. 
> Standard, Synonym and SoundsLike.
> Now that the QueryParser has the ability to put multiple tokens in
> one position I no longer have to inject the synonyms at index
> creation time.  So I really don't have to have a seperate index for
> Synonyms I can just point to my standard index and inject the
> synonyms into the query.  
> 
> That should make adminstration easier.  Along that train of thought
> it would be nice if I could have only one index.  That brings me to
> my question.  When constructing an index only one anlyzer is allowed.
>  Do you think it would be better to build 2 indexes and then merge
> them or somehow merge the standard tokens with the soundslike tokens
> at index creating time? 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message