Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56807 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2005 06:36:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2005 06:36:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4938 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2005 06:35:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4624 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2005 06:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4588 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2005 06:35:49 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail.tanto.de (HELO mail.tanto.de) (213.61.178.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:35:47 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tanto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF0023CE5; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.tanto.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.tanto.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08980-07; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tucholsky.office.tanto.de (tucholsky.office.tanto.de [10.0.0.35]) by mail.tanto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1043323CE0; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tucholsky.office.tanto.de (morus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucholsky.office.tanto.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j3D6cU4B018685; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:38:30 +0200 Received: (from morus@localhost) by tucholsky.office.tanto.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j3D6cTH0018681; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:38:29 +0200 From: Morus Walter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16988.48741.795454.194917@tanto-xipolis.de> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:38:29 +0200 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, Subject: RE: Lucene on Linux problem... In-Reply-To: <20050412160631.5498227E19C@ns2.pil.dk> References: <1112603090.15511.45.camel@saturn> <20050412160631.5498227E19C@ns2.pil.dk> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.tanto.de Q&A postmaster@tanto.de X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kristian Ottosen writes: > > It seems to work now - but I would still love to see a good explanation. > How was your java application started? (sorry I you already explained, I didn't keep the thread and the mailing list archive seems to be out of order) I remember strange problems (with mkdir in my case) when using java servlets within a tomcat that was started by apache daemon. The problem occured on some linux installations only. The reason we found after quite some debugging was, that daemon wasn't linked to libpthread, so java was somehow using the wrong libc (or something similar, I never understood all details). (daemon started, loading the unthreaded libc and handed control to the java binary which continued using that libc while requireing a threaded) I don't know if your problems have anything to do with such effects, but when you say, it happens on some distributions while others work, that comes into my mind. If the same jar file works on one linux installation and fails on another it's suggesting that the problem is on the jvm level or it's libraries. Morus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org